Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Adrian Vanderveer, Respondent, v. John Suydam, Appellant, 1897 — 151 N.Y. 673 · caselaw · US
General
Adrian Vanderveer, Respondent, v. John Suydam, Appellant
151 N.Y. 673·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adrian Vanderveer, Respondent, v. John Suydam, Appellant.
Vanderveer v. Suydam, 83 Hun, 116, affirmed.
(Argued January 29, 1897;
decided February 12, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 12, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
Josiah T. Marean for appellant.
Edward M. Grout for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.