General

Nathan N. Cortese et al., Doing Business as Cortese Restaurant, Appellants, v. Beatrice C. Connors, Respondent, and Norbert Eisenstein, Intervener-Respondent. (Action No. 1.); Norbert Eisenstein, Respondent, v. Beatrice C. Connors, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

285 A.D. 846·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1955·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Nathan N. Cortese et al., Doing Business as Cortese Restaurant, Appellants, v. Beatrice C. Connors, Respondent, and Norbert Eisenstein, Intervener-Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Norbert Eisenstein, Respondent, v. Beatrice C. Connors, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) [MAJORITY] Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Imrie and Zeller, JJ. [See ante, p. 40.]