Contracts · MBE-tested
United States et al. v. Wilson & Company, Inc., et al.
376 U.S. 944·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 711.
United States et al. v. Wilson & Company, Inc., et al.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum and Ralph S, Spritzer for the United States; and Max D. Paglin and Daniel R. Ohlbaum for the Federal Communications Commission. Charles A. Bane and Sharon L. King for Wilson & Company et al.; and Kenneth F. Burgess, Howard P. Robinson and Howard J. Trienens for American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et ah, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.