Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. McNinch, doing business as Home Comport Co., et al., 1958 — 355 U.S. 948 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. McNinch, doing business as Home Comport Co., et al.
355 U.S. 948·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 146.
United States v. McNinch, doing business as Home Comport Co., et al.
A. C. Epps and Charles W. Laughlin for Cato Bros., Inc., et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 355 U. S. 808, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The motion to remove this case from the summary calendar is granted and a total of one hour and a half allowed for oral argument.