General
Nellie R. Kurtz, Appellant, v. Eugene Clifford Potter and Riverside Wheelmen of New York, Respondents
167 N.Y. 586·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nellie R. Kurtz, Appellant, v. Eugene Clifford Potter and Riverside Wheelmen of New York, Respondents.
(Argued May 6, 1901;
decided May 24, 1901.)
Kurtz v. Potter, 44 App. Div. 262, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 6, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
George C. Austin and Scott McLanahan for appellant.
Charles Henry Butler for respondent Potter.
G. Leslie Harwood for respondent Riverside Wheelmen.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., Geay, Babtlett, Haight, Mastín, Yann and Webneb, JJ.