Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacob Strader and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Christopher Graham, 1855 — 59 U.S. 602 · caselaw · US
General
Jacob Strader and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Christopher Graham
59 U.S. 60218 How. 602·Supreme Court of the United States·1855
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob Strader and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Christopher Graham.
Where a ease is dismissed for want of jurisdiction this court cannot give a judgment for costs.
[MAJORITY]
This case was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, at December term, 1850, 10 How. 82.
At the present term, Mr. Crittenden, of counsel for the defendant in error, moved the court to amend the judgment entered in this cause at- the December term, 1850, and to give a judgment for the costs in this court in favor of his client. Whereupon it is now here considered by the -court that .this court cannot give a judgment for costs in a case dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and it appearing to-this court that this cause has been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, it is thereupon now here ordered by the court that the said motion .be and the same is hereby overruled.