Contracts · MBE-tested
GOLDSTEIN, aka PIETRARU, et al. v. COX et al., SURROGATES OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, et al.
389 U.S. 581·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GOLDSTEIN, aka PIETRARU, et al. v. COX et al., SURROGATES OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, et al.
No. 825.
Decided January 15, 1968.
John R. Tintilla, Emanuel Eschwege and Novak N. Marku for petitioners.
Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Zschernig v. Miller, ante, p. 429.