Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Drath, trading as Broadway Gift Co., v. Federal Trade Commission, 1957 — 353 U.S. 917 · caselaw · US
General
Drath, trading as Broadway Gift Co., v. Federal Trade Commission
353 U.S. 917·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 755.
Drath, trading as Broadway Gift Co., v. Federal Trade Commission.
Horace J. Donnelly, Jr. and Warren W■ Grimes for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Daniel M. Friedman, Earl W. Kint-ner and Robert B. Dawkins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.