Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rodrigue et al. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. et al., 1969 — 394 U.S. 956 · caselaw · US
Admiralty
Rodrigue et al. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. et al.
394 U.S. 956·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 436.
Rodrigue et al. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 393 U. S. 932.] The parties and the Solicitor General as amicus curiae are invited to file further briefs within 30 days addressing the following question: “In light of the cases in this Court relating to the limits of admiralty jurisdiction, such as Phoenix Construction Co. v. The Steamer Poughkeepsie, 212 U. S. 558, affirming 162 F. 494 (D. C. S. D. N. Y. 1908), and in light of the language and legislative history of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, does the Death on the High Seas Act apply to these accidents?” See Pure Oil Co. v. Snipes, 293 F. 2d 60 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1961).