Property · MBE-tested
In the Matter of Stuart R. Levine, Appellant, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents, and 315 East 65th Street Owners Corp., Intervenor-Respondent
243 A.D.2d 373663 N.Y.S.2d 205·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1997·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Stuart R. Levine, Appellant, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents, and 315 East 65th Street Owners Corp., Intervenor-Respondent.
[663 NYS2d 205]
[MAJORITY]
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered March 20, 1997, dismissing petitioner tenant’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent agency’s award to intervenor landlord of a major capital improvement rent increase, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The petition was properly dismissed on the ground that the evidence petitioner relies on was offered for the first time in his Petition for Administrative Review although it had been available to him for two years and could have been submitted to the Rent Administrator (9 NYCRR 2529.6; Matter of Birdoff & Co. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 204 AD2d 630; Matter of 985 Fifth Ave. v State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 171 AD2d 572, 574-575, lv denied 78 NY2d 861). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Nardelli, Williams and Colabella, JJ.