General
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al. v. SPRING VALLEY WATER CO.
204 F. 1006·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1913
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al. v. SPRING VALLEY WATER CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 1913.)
No. 2,176.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California; William O. Van Fleet, Judge.
Percy V. Long, City Atty., and Thos. E. Haven, Asst. City Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
John W. Shenk, City Atty., and George E. Cryer, Asst. City Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., amici eurise.
Edward J. McCutehen, A. Crawford Greene, and Page, McCutchen, Knight & Olney, all of San Francisco, Cal., for. appellee.
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of the decisimi of the Supreme Court in. the case of Home Telephone & Telegraph Company v. City of Los Angeles et al., 227 U. S. 278, 33 Sup. Ct. 312, 57 L. Ed. -, October term, 1912, the judgment is affirmed.