Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Ten Reels of a Motion Picture, entitled "Quiet Days in Clichy" (Grove Press, claimant), 1970 — 399 U.S. 920 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Ten Reels of a Motion Picture, entitled "Quiet Days in Clichy" (Grove Press, claimant)
399 U.S. 920·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Stewart would vacate the stay. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No.-.
United States v. Ten Reels of a Motion Picture, entitled “Quiet Days in Clichy” (Grove Press, claimant).
[MAJORITY]
D. C. C. D. Cal. Application to vacate stay heretofore issued by Mr. Justice Black denied, with leave to renew, however, if a trial on the obscenity vel non of this film has not commenced by August 3, 1970, unless any delay of the trial beyond that date has been occasioned by appellee Grove Press.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Stewart would vacate the stay. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.