Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
In the Matter of Sara L. Vickers, Appellant, v. Arthur J. Carlsen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Erie, and James W. Pitts, Respondents
71 A.D.2d 1047·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1979·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Sara L. Vickers, Appellant, v Arthur J. Carlsen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Erie, and James W. Pitts, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
—Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Bayger, J. (See Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993; Matter of Berry v Dodd, 38 NY2d 995; Matter of Berger v Acito, 64 AD2d 949; Matter of Fiorella v Mahoney, 64 AD2d 1008.) Doerr, J., not participating. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—Election Law.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Aug. 23, 1979.)