Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Molsen v. Young, Inspector in Charge, U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1950 — 340 U.S. 880 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Molsen v. Young, Inspector in Charge, U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
340 U.S. 880·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 292.
Molsen v. Young, Inspector in Charge, U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Searcy L. Johnson for petitioner. Solicitor General Perl-man for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The joint motion of petitioner and the Solicitor General for remand of this case is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals and the District Court are vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court for consideration of the effect of § 25 of the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 987, 1013, with leave to each party to present further evidence upon the material issues of the case.