General
Mary E. Richards, Respondent, v. Francis H. Stillman et al., Respondents, and Sarah G. Watson, as Executrix of Thomas H. Watson, Deceased, Appellant
172 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary E. Richards, Respondent, v. Francis H. Stillman et al., Respondents, and Sarah G. Watson, as Executrix of Thomas H. Watson, Deceased, Appellant.
Richards v. Stillman, 57 App. Div. 182, affirmed.
(Argued October 22, 1902;
decided November 11, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 29, 1901, affirming a judgment directing the appellant herein to pay costs arising in an action to-foreclose a mortgage.
Barclay E. V. McOarty and Jared G. Baldwin, Jr., for appellant.
Frank M. Tichenor for plaintiff, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.