Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Simmons et al. v. Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, et al.; and Fritz et al. v. Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, et al., 1974 — 417 U.S. 902 · caselaw · US
General
Simmons et al. v. Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, et al.; and Fritz et al. v. Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, et al.
417 U.S. 902·Supreme Court of the United States·1974
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 73-1483.
No. 73-1484.
Simmons et al. v. Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, et al.; and Fritz et al. v. Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion of Association of Washington Business, Inc., for substitution of representative of class party or in the alternative for leave to intervene in No. 73-1484 denied. Appeals dismissed for want of substantial federal question.