General
FORSYTH MFG. CO. v. PUTNAM, HOOKER & CO.
139 F. 1007·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FORSYTH MFG. CO. v. PUTNAM, HOOKER & CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 14, 1905.)
No. 1,440.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.
R. L. Berner, for plaintiff in error.
Isaac Hardeman and Geo. S. Jones, for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The record in this case fails to disclose such diverse citizenship as to confer jurisdiction upon the Circuit Court, and therefore, •on authority of Knight et al. v. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Company (C. C. A.) 136 Fed. 404, the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, with costs against the defendants in error, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court, with instructions to proceed according to law and in conformity with our views as expressed in Knight et al. v. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Company, above referred to.