General
THE RIVER MEANDER
250 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1918
Before WARD, R.OGERS, and HOUGH, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE RIVER MEANDER,
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 10, 1918.)
No. 204.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Libel by the P. Lorillard Company against the steamship River Meander, her engines, etc., claimed by Norton & Sons, together with four other consolidated cases. There were decrees for libelants (209 Eed. 931), and claimant appeals.
Affirmed.
Kirlin, Woolsey & I-Iickox, of New York City (J. Parker Kirlin, John M. Woolsey, and Harry D. Thirkield, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Harrington, Big-ham & Englar, of New York CltyRD'. Roger Englar, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before WARD, R.OGERS, and HOUGH, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree (209 Fed. 931) affirmed.