Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. PREWITT, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF KENTUCKY, 1906 — 200 U.S. 450 · caselaw · US
Securities
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. PREWITT, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF KENTUCKY
200 U.S. 45050 L. Ed. 549·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. PREWITT, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF KENTUCKY.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.
No. 184.
Argued January 16, 1906.
Decided February 19, 1906.
Security-Life.Ins. Co. v. Preioitt, ante, p. 446, followed.
"Mr. John G. Johnson and Mr. Edmund F. Trabue, with whom Mr. John D. Doolan, Mr. Attilla Cox, ■ Jr., and Mr. William Bro Smith were on the brief, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. H. Hazelrigg, with whom Mr. N. B. Hays, - Attorney General 'of the State of Kentucky, and Mr. H. R. Prewitt were on the brief, for defendant in error:
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Peckham:]
Mr. Justice Peckham:
This case involves the same principle as that decided in the foregoing case, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion above, the writ of erroi' to the Court o'f Appeals of the State of Kentucky is
Dismissed.