General
HAMMOND v. STOCKTON COMBINED HARVESTER & AGRICULTURAL WORKS
72 F. 687·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1896
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HAMMOND v. STOCKTON COMBINED HARVESTER & AGRICULTURAL WORKS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 14, 1896.)
No. 231.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
This was a petition for a rehearing. See, for former opinion, 17 C. C. A. 356, 70 Fed. 716.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The petition for rehearing is denied. The motion to certify questions of law to the supreme court, having been filed after the decision of the case, and pending the motion for a rehearing, will not be entertained; and, the petition for a rehearing having been denied, the motion to certify is directed to be stricken from the files.