Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Adam Emmerich v. Peter Hefferan, 1887 — 104 N.Y. 676 · caselaw · US
General
Adam Emmerich v. Peter Hefferan
104 N.Y. 676·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
All concur; no opinion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adam Emmerich v. Peter Hefferan.
(Argued February 1, 1887;
decided February 8, 1887.)
Wales F. Severance for motion.
Wm. G. McOrea opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to dismiss appeal from order refusing to grant a new trial granted.
Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment granted, unless the sureties on the bond of the appellant shall justify, if required by respondent, in which case motion denied.
All concur; no opinion.
Ordered accordingly.