General
In the Matter of the Application of PETER DRAGICH for Writ of Habeas Corpus
48 Cal. App. 796·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1920·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Grim. No. 729.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
Two.July 10, 1920.]
In the Matter of the Application of PETER DRAGICH for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Fish and . Game — Extent op State Sovereignty — "Validity op Section 636, Penal Code. — Writ discharged and petitioner remanded on the authority of Matter of Mm'incovich, ante, p. 474.
PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure the release of petitioner from custody on a charge of violating section 636 of the Penal Code. Writ discharged and petitioner remanded.
The facts are in all material aspects the same as in Matter of Marineovich,, ante, p. 474.
C. W. Pendleton and Henry E. Carter for Petitioner.
Thomas Lee Woolwine, District Attorney, and W. J. Clark" for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
— The facts in this proceeding are in all material aspects the same as in the Matter of Marine .covich, ante, p. 474, [192 Pac. 156], For the reasons there given, petitioner is remanded and the writ discharged.