Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Automatic Electric Co. v. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., et al., 1966 — 384 U.S. 1002 · caselaw · US
General
Automatic Electric Co. v. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., et al.
384 U.S. 1002·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1338.
Automatic Electric Co. v. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., et al.
Arthur A. Olson, Theodore W. Anderson, Jr., and Victor Myer for petitioner. Walter J. Blenko and Walter J. Blenko, Jr., for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.