Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Baber, Respondent, v. The Broadway and Seventh Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 584 · caselaw · US
General
George Baber, Respondent, v. The Broadway and Seventh Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant
149 N.Y. 584·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Baber, Respondent, v. The Broadway and Seventh Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant.
Baber v. Broadway & 7th Ave. R. R. Co., 9 Misc. Rep. 20, affirmed.
(Argued April 16, 1896;
decided May 1, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made June 4, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
John T. Little, Jr., and Henry A. Robinson for appellant.
Gilbert D. Lamb and Robert D. Petty for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.