Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Baumann et al. v. Smrha, Chief Engineer, Division of Water Resources, Kansas State Board of Agriculture, et al., 1956 — 352 U.S. 863 · caselaw · US
General
Baumann et al. v. Smrha, Chief Engineer, Division of Water Resources, Kansas State Board of Agriculture, et al.
352 U.S. 863·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 285.
Baumann et al. v. Smrha, Chief Engineer, Division of Water Resources, Kansas State Board of Agriculture, et al.
Kenneth G. Speir and Herbert H. Sizemore for appellants. John Anderson, Jr., Attorney General of Kansas, Paul E. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Warden L. Noe, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Smrha, and Robt. B. Morton and Paul J. Donaldson for the City of Wichita, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction.