Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Womack v. City of Norfolk, 1979 — 443 U.S. 902 · caselaw · US
General
Womack v. City of Norfolk
443 U.S. 902·Supreme Court of the United States·1979
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78-1638.
Womack v. City of Norfolk.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Va. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari, as does the Court, and would grant certiorari and reverse the conviction.