Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George H. Douglass et al., Respondents, v. Gilman Dudley, Appellant, 1872 — 48 N.Y. 688 · caselaw · US
General
George H. Douglass et al., Respondents, v. Gilman Dudley, Appellant
48 N.Y. 688·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George H. Douglass et al., Respondents, v. Gilman Dudley, Appellant.
(Argued January 8, 1872;
decided May term, 1872.)
Action upon a promissory note. The note was placed by defendant in the hands of a broker to be discounted for and on account of defendant. The broker had also in his hands fifty, shares of Pacific Mail Steamship Company stock belonging to plaintiffs. Without the knowledge or assent of the parties, the broker pledged the note and stock for a loan for his individual benefit. He subsequently failed. Plaintiffs, without knowledge that defendant’s note had been diverted,- or that it was other than business, paper given for value, paid the amount of the loan and received the stock and note. ^The referee, before whom the cause was tried, decided that plaintiffs were entitled to contribution in the proportion the amount of the note bore to the value of the stock, and gave judgment accordingly.
Wm. F. Shepard for the appellant.
John S. Jenness for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Gray, C., reads for affirmance.
All concur. Judgment affirmed.