General
Hilma Nelson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Richard G. Wood
241 U.S. 637·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 158.
Hilma Nelson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Richard G. Wood.
In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Argued January 11 and 12 for the plaintiff in error, and submitted by defendant in error.
Decided January 17, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Mr. A. J. H. Frank for the plaintiff in error. Mr. C. E. Morgan, Sd, and Mr. R. Stuart Smith for the defendant in error.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U. S. 477; McCormick v. Oklahoma City, 236 U. S. 657; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R., 237 U. S. 575; Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Publishing Co., 237 U. S. 618.