General
DETROIT STEEL COOPERAGE CO. v. SISTERSVILLE BREWING CO. et al.
195 F. 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DETROIT STEEL COOPERAGE CO. v. SISTERSVILLE BREWING CO. et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 1, 1912.)
No. 1,081.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. On petition for rehearing.
Denied.
For former opinion, see 195 Fed. 447.
Charles N. Kimball, of Sistorsville, W. Va., and George M. Hoffheimer, of Clarksburg, W. Va. (Orla 15. Taylor and Walter S. Sugden, both of Sisters-ville. W. Va., on the briefs), for appellant.
Thomas P. Jacobs, of New Martinsville, W. Va. (Arlen G. Swiger, of Sistersville, W. Va., on the brief), for appellees.
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and BOYD and ROSE, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Rehearing denied.
[DISSENT — PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge]
PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge
(dissenting). I concurred in the opinion rendered in this case 195 Fed. 447, but after a careful reading of the petition for rehearing, and also the case of Tippett & Wood v. Barham, 180 Fed. 76, 103 C. C. A. 430, I am of the opinion that, inasmuch as the vendor reserved a lien on the tanks in controversy for the purchase price, which was duly recorded in accordance with the laws of West Virginia, the title never passed to the mortgagee under the after-acquired property clause, but remained in the vendor.
Therefore I think a rehearing should be granted.
End of Cases in Vol. 195