Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ethel Fisher DIXON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1012 · caselaw · US
Tax
Ethel Fisher DIXON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
75 F.2d 1012·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ethel Fisher DIXON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 5485.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 28, 1935.
Marcus Whiting, of Chicago, 111., for petitioner.
Frank J. Wideman, of Washington, D. G, for respondent.
Before . EVANS and ALSCHULER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for respondent, it is now here ordered and adjudged that this cause be docketed in this court, and that the petition for a review of the decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals, entered on April 21, 1932, be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.