General
Isidore Shlemansky et al., Respondents, v. Henry Lapidus et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Henry's Luncheonette, Defendants, and Leon Lapidus, Appellant
275 A.D.2d 658·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1949·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isidore Shlemansky et al., Respondents, v. Henry Lapidus et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Henry’s Luncheonette, Defendants, and Leon Lapidus, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Yoorhis, JJ.