General
In the Matter of the Application of Morris Koppelman and Herman Hoffer, Petitioners, Respondents, for an Injunction Order Pursuant to Sections 123 and 124 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (Chapter 478 of the Laws of 1934), against Sunset Wine Co., Inc., Appellant, and Henry S. Bruckman and Others, Constituting the Liquor Authority of the State of New York, Respondents
263 A.D. 967·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1942·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Morris Koppelman and Herman Hoffer, Petitioners, Respondents, for an Injunction Order Pursuant to Sections 123 and 124 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (Chapter 478 of the Laws of 1934), against Sunset Wine Co., Inc., Appellant, and Henry S. Bruckman and Others, Constituting the Liquor Authority of the State of New York, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Motion for stay denied. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.