Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Evan Adames, Appellant

38 A.D.3d 385830 N.Y.S.2d 904·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2007·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Evan Adames, Appellant. [830 NYS2d 904] [MAJORITY] Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael A. Corriero, J.), rendered June 27, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed. We perceive no basis for reducing defendant’s term of postrelease supervision. For the reasons stated in our decision in People v Lemos (34 AD3d 343 [2006]), we reject defendant’s argument that the court unlawfully imposed a mandatory surcharge and fees when it did so in writing, without including the surcharge and fees in its oral pronouncement of sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.