General
In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Audrey L. Jacobsen, Respondent
142 A.D.3d 122337 N.Y.S.3d 462·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2016·NY
Garry, J.P., Rose, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Audrey L. Jacobsen, Respondent.
[37 NYS3d 462]—
[MAJORITY]
Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984, was suspended by this Court’s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).
Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 118. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.
Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.
Garry, J.P., Rose, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.