Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward P. Bates, Respondent, v. Salt Springs National Bank of Syracuse et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents, 1897 — 151 N.Y. 669 · caselaw · US
General
Edward P. Bates, Respondent, v. Salt Springs National Bank of Syracuse et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents
151 N.Y. 669·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward P. Bates, Respondent, v. Salt Springs National Bank of Syracuse et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents.
(Submitted February 1, 1897;
decided February 9, 1897.)
Motion to prefer, under subdivision 7, section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground that a defendant and appellant is a banking institution.
Wilson & Forbes for motion.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.