Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isaac J. Evans et al., Appellants, v. The State of New York, Respondent, 1902 — 169 N.Y. 612 · caselaw · US
General
Isaac J. Evans et al., Appellants, v. The State of New York, Respondent
169 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac J. Evans et al., Appellants, v. The State of New York, Respondent.
(Argued January 20, 1902;
decided January 28, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 1Y, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon an award of the Court of Claims.
G. D. Prescott and Harvey S. Bedell for appellants.
John C. Dmies, Attorney-General {George H. Stevens of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.