General
The First National Bank of Defiance, Plaintiff in Error, v. William A. Kehnast et al.
241 U.S. 654·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 333.
The First National Bank of Defiance, Plaintiff in Error, v. William A. Kehnast et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio.
Argued April 28 and May 1, 1916.
Decided May 22, 1916.
Mr. Robert Newbegin and Mr. Henry Newbegin for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Tellis T. Shaw, Mr. Harold W. Fraser, Mr. Henry B. Harris and Mr. E. J. Marshall for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Chemical National Bank v. City Bank of Portage, 160 U. S. 646; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134. (2) Leather Manufacturers’ Bank v. Cooper, 120 U. S. 778, 781; Whittemore v. Amoskeag National Bank, 134 U. S. 527; Petri v. Commercial National Bank of Chicago, 142 U. S. 644; Hermann v. Edwards, 238 U. S. 107.