General
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. St. Paul Association of Commerce et al.
246 U.S. 679·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 262.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. St. Paul Association of Commerce et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota.
March 28, 1918.
Mr. Asa G. Briggs, Mr. E. C. Bindley, Mr. W. H. Bremner, Mr. James B. Sheean, Mr. McNeil V. Seymour, Mr. Edward M. Hyzer, Mr. Carl C. Wright, Mr. Charles W. Bunn, Mr. Charles Donnelly, Mr. F. W. Root and Mr. Alfred H. Bright for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Thomas D. O'Brien for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the plaintiffs in error.