Contracts · MBE-tested

MARCHESE v. UNITED STATES et al.

374 U.S. 10110 L. Ed. 2d 1026·Supreme Court of the United States·1963

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan would deny certiorari on the basis of their dissent in Sanders v. United States, 373 U. S., at 23.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

MARCHESE v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 362. Decided June 10, 1963. Russell E. Parsons and Sol C. Berenholtz for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Philip R. Monahan for the United States et al. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for reconsideration in light of Sanders v. United States, 373 U. S. 1. Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan would deny certiorari on the basis of their dissent in Sanders v. United States, 373 U. S., at 23.