Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit of the United States, 1969 — 395 U.S. 956 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit of the United States
395 U.S. 956·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 2,
Misc.
Chandler, U. S. District Judge v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit of the United States.
Carl L. Shipley, pro se, on motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief.
Thomas J. Kenan for petitioner on motion to advance.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of Carl L. Shipley for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion to advance denied. Case set for oral argument on October 20, 1969, on motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus. Additional briefs may be filed by the parties, and petitioner’s brief, if any, is due within 60 days and that of respondent within 30 days thereafter.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.