General
Sigmond Ornstine, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. J. Cary
204 U.S. 669·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 200.
Sigmond Ornstine, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. J. Cary.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin.
Argued January 31, 1907.
Decided February 25, 1907.
Mr. E. M. McVicker for plaintiff in error.
Mr. A. C. Titus and Mr. L. M. Sturdevant for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. DeWolf v. Johnson, 10 Wheat. 386; Missouri, Kansas and Texas Trust Company v. Krumseig, 172 U. S. 351; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Kentucky, 161 U. S. 677, 700; Frisbie v. United States, 157 U. S. 160; Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133; Dunham v. Gould, 16 Johnson, 378; Commonwealth v. Danziger, 176 Massachusetts, 290; Ex parte Berger, 193 Missouri, 16; case below, State v. Cary, 126 Wisconsin, 135, and see State v. Kreutzberg, 114 Wisconsin, 530.