Torts · MBE-tested

POLK McPHERSON, Respondent, v. J. C. WALLING et al., Appellants

58 Cal. App. 792·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1922·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Civ. No. 3821. Second Appellate District, Division Two. July 19, 1922.] POLK McPHERSON, Respondent, v. J. C. WALLING et al., Appellants. Negligence—Collision or Motor Vehicles—Relative Dutt ot Parties — Erroneous Instruction.—Judgment reversed on the authority of McFherson v. Walling, ante, p. 563. APPEAL from a judgment of the. Superior Court of Tulare County. W. B. Wallace, Judge. Reversed. . The issues involved are identical with those in McPherson v. Walling, ante, p. 563. Ernest Walling and Power & McFadzean for Appellants. J. A. Chase and Max B. Jamison for Respondent. [MAJORITY — CRAIG, J.] CRAIG, J. The issues involved in this appeal are identically the same as those .in McPherson v. Walling, ante, p. 563 [209 Pac. 209]. The records were presented on appeal in one transcript. The reasons given in granting a reversal in that case apply to this, its companion case. The judgment is reversed. Finlayson, P. J., and Works, J., concurred.