Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Edward Gorman, Deceased. Patrick Larkin, Appellant; John McNamee, as Executor, Respondent, 1903 — 177 N.Y. 527 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Edward Gorman, Deceased. Patrick Larkin, Appellant; John McNamee, as Executor, Respondent
177 N.Y. 527·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Edward Gorman, Deceased. Patrick Larkin, Appellant; John McNamee, as Executor, Respondent.
Matter of Gorman, 80 App. Div. 640, affirmed.
(Argued November 23, 1903;
decided December 8, 1903.)
Appeal from 'a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in • the second judicial department, entered March 6, 1903, which affirmed a decree of the Kings County Surrogate’s Court admitting to probate the will of Edward Gorman, deceased.
John R. Kuhn for appellant.
Herbert T. Ketcham and Joseph H. Owens for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ.