Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. O., et al. v. Anderson, District Judge, et al., 1956 — 351 U.S. 959 · caselaw · US
General
International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. O., et al. v. Anderson, District Judge, et al.
351 U.S. 959·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 4, 1956.
No. 565.
International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, C. I. O., et al. v. Anderson, District Judge, et al.
Harold A. Cranefield and Kurt L. Hanslowe for appellants. Leland W. Scott for McQuay, Inc., appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, ante, p. 266, decided this day.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.