General
Stanley J. Oppenheim, Respondent, v. Stanley Sefchik et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Art Novelty Linen Manufacturers, Appellants
283 A.D. 1028·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1954·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stanley J. Oppenheim, Respondent, v. Stanley Sefchik et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Art Novelty Linen Manufacturers, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. In affirming we do not pass upon the substantiality of the plaintiff’s claim. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Bastow and Botein, JJ.