Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Adamant Manufacturing Company of America, Respondent, v. Lewis Z. Bach, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 555 · caselaw · US
General
Adamant Manufacturing Company of America, Respondent, v. Lewis Z. Bach, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
163 N.Y. 555·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adamant Manufacturing Company of America, Respondent, v. Lewis Z. Bach, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Adamant Manufacturing Co. v. Bach, 26 App. Div. 255, affirmed.
(Argued April 23, 1900;
decided May 8, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 26, 1898, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Edwin _L. Palish for appellant,
Henry H. Abbott for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landón, JJ.