General
LORD v. STAPLES & HANFORD CO.
148 F. 19·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1906
Before COLT and PUTNAM, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LORD v. STAPLES & HANFORD CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
July 24, 1906.)
No. 629.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of AI sachusetts.
Frederic P. Warfield and Plolland S. Duell, for complainant.
Fred L,. Chappell, Chappell & Earl, and Roberts & Mitchell, for defendant
Before COLT and PUTNAM, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM-.]
PER CURIAM-.
The court having fully considered the petition filed by the defendant, appellant, on June 21, 1906, for leave to proceed further in the court below, on account of alleged newly-discovered evidence, and being clearly of the opinion that the alleged newly-discovered evidence is of a class of evidence which was always within the reach of the defendant, appellant, by the use of ordinary diligence, and, also, being of the opinion that it is immaterial because it relates to sheet metal spring supports:
It is ordered that the petition be, and the same is hereby, denied.