General

Ex parte Robert E. ROBERSON

43 Ala. App. 354190 So. 2d 566·Alabama Court of Appeals·1966·AL

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

190 So.2d 566 Ex parte Robert E. ROBERSON. 2 Div. 147. Court of Appeals of Alabama. Sept. 27, 1966.' Robert E. Roberson, pro se. Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Jas. H. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. [MAJORITY — CATES, Judge.] CATES, Judge. This is an original action for mandamus. Petitioner sought post conviction review while he still had time to take a direct appeal. The circuit court correctly dismissed his petition for coram nobis. Mandamus is not a substitute for an appeal. The petition on its face requires that it be and, on motion of the Attorney General, it is hereby Dismissed.