Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Kanter, Appellant, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 561 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Kanter, Appellant
180 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Kanter, Appellant.
People v. Kanter, 100 App. Div. 516, affirmed.
(Argued February 2, 1905;
decided February 21, 1905.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 10, 1905, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree.
Max D. Steuer for appellant.
William Travers Jerome, District Attorney (Howard S. Gans of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: O’Brien, J. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J„