General
AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KIRSTEIN OPTICAL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants
16 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KIRSTEIN OPTICAL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 13, 1926.)
No. 188.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.
Davis & Simms, of Rochester, N. Y. (C. Schuyler Davis,' of Rochester, N. Y., and Drury W/ Cooper, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Kirstein Optical Co.
Charles Neave, of New York City, Harrison F. Lyman, of Boston, Mass., and H. H. Styll, of Southbridge, Mass., for appellee American Optical Co.
• Before MANTON and MACK, Circuit Judges, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on' opinion of Hazel, District Judge, 9 F.(2d) 932.